I switched a lot of people from Atripla to more contemporary regimens based on CNS effects, low resistance barrier, and TDF toxicity issues. What surprised me was that many of them, who denied having any CNS side effects on efavirenz, reported feeling better after the switch. They often described feeling more awake and alert in the morning, or even having improved mood. On patient said, "It was like someone opened the curtains, and I never knew they were closed." Also, as people get older, the bone and kidney toxicity of TDF become more important. So while I wouldn;'t force a switch, I'd bring it up at every visit.
Original Message:
Sent: 04-26-2025 08:40
From: Patrick Aufiero
Subject: Changing ART without genotype available in setting of cardiac and renal comorbidities
Agree discussion of all hiv meds once daily or injections
and not to switch unless issue as described in case
What to do if all labs normal, no body changes, or any other issues with the "Atripla" and stable patient, who has been on for
years, and do you still change the hiv drug in this stable, long term patient?
Just asking
thanks
------------------------------
Patrick Aufiero
Long Beach Township NJ
Original Message:
Sent: 04-25-2025 16:36
From: Jeffrey Kirchner
Subject: Changing ART without genotype available in setting of cardiac and renal comorbidities
Although I certainly agree with Joel, having been in the HIV/AIDS clinical world since 1989, I think we must always approach switches with patients cautiously and respectively - and certainly do so if indeed there are adverse renal, hepatic or perhaps metabolic effects. Drug-drug interactions were also a frequent concern with boosted PIs - but less so these days.
We switched LOTS of patients in the past - mainly for simplification purposes or drug side-effect. But once we were at QD dosing - it often comes down to shared decision making with our patients. This is especially important with a new patient who you have not established a relationship with (e.g. - trust). As a quick example, we recently had a new patient come in to us on ATRIPLA (you may need to look this one up). She is clinically very stable, undetectable, and has a normal CD4 count/ %. We discussed switching in the future, and likely will do so - but did not do this at her first visit.
Original Message:
Sent: 4/24/2025 4:57:00 PM
From: Alvaro Lopez
Subject: RE: Changing ART without genotype available in setting of cardiac and renal comorbidities
Can you not get a genotype Archive? if you cannot, would favor switching to an INSTI regimen as per Dr. Gallant.
For a patient that has been on treatment since the 90s, would be concerned that he may have seen an NNRTI or a regimen with 3TC in the past that would make the use of DTG/3TC or DTG/RPV risky now
------------------------------
AlvaroLopezMDAustellGA
Original Message:
Sent: 04-23-2025 09:48
From: Emily Delmotte
Subject: Changing ART without genotype available in setting of cardiac and renal comorbidities
Good morning,
I'm hoping for guidance on changing ART for a 79 y/o M with long history of HIV, but new to our practice. Briefly, he is virally suppressed on FTC/TAF + ATV 400mg daily. He's been on the current regimen since 2018, and notes from previous provider state that only known prior regimen was FTC/TDF + ATV 400mg daily. Patient is unaware of any prior resistance or virologic failure, but no genotype is available. He was diagnosed in the mid-90s. PMH is significant for stage 3b CKD, CAD, HTN, COPD, dyslipidemia.
Given his renal function, I'm looking to modify his regimen to one that is tenofovir-free. I've been told that some providers are using DTG/3TC at GFRs below what's listed in the package insert. I'm also considering DTG/RPV vs renally dosed components of ABC/DTG/3TC. I'm trying to weigh the risks of a two-drug regimen - without genotype results - against the potential cardiac risks of ABC. Any guidance is appreciated.
Thank you,
Emily Delmotte, NP, MSPH
------------------------------
Emily Delmotte
Berrien Springs MI
------------------------------